Read Editorial with D2G – Ep CCLXXII (272)

the hindu logo

 D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC

President Xi Jinping’s message to the World Economic Forum in Davos was timely and perhaps (used to express uncertainty or possibility) visionary as well, in this time of extraordinary global uncertainty. It is no surprise if, as in the case of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s potential leadership of the Western alliance, questions have arisen at this juncture (a particular point in events or time) about Mr. Xi’s willingness to take up cudgels (a short, thick stick used as a weapon) on behalf of broader internationalism and against the rising tide of inward-looking nationalism.

His address at the opening plenary ((of a meeting) to be attended by all participants at a conference or assembly) before captains of business and industry could not have been a more robust (strong and healthy) and reassuring defence of the current world economic order, perceived (come to realize or understand) to be at its most fragile (easily destroyed or threatened) in the post-War era with the election of Donald Trump as U.S. President. Foremost is Mr. Xi’s caution against attempts to prevent the free flow of goods, services, capital and people as running counter to the historical trend. It is tempting (appealing to or attracting someone) to interpret this remark as a pointed rebuke (an expression of sharp disapproval or criticism) to growing calls for economic protectionism at a time when a slump in world trade underpins slow economic growth.

Not to be missed also is the categorical support he expressed for the swift enforcement of the Paris accord on climate change. Mr. Xi reiterated (say something again or a number of times) the call for a reform of global economic governance structures, to reflect the contribution of the emerging and developing countries. His plea for more inclusive representation is in contrast to the unprecedented (never done or known before) attacks mounted (riding an animal, typically a horse) against post-War institutions in the same countries that crafted their original architecture.

Mr. Xi fundamentally rejected the stance (the way in which someone stands) that seeks to lay the blame for the current challenges at the doorstep of globalisation. The tragic (relating to tragedy in a literary work) effects of mass migration, he said, have their roots in the recent wars and regional conflicts, rather than in economic globalisation. His diagnosis of Europe’s challenges on this front could not entirely be faulted, even if it is largely true that the developing countries have reaped most of the benefits of economic mobility, rather than having to deal with the difficulties of immigration.

There may be arguments over the modes and methods of managing the political fallout from globalisation. But there is no denying the mounting and demonstrable evidence that the post-Cold War era of open economies has brought unprecedented prosperity and income redistribution around the world. Mr. Xi’s case for globalisation is the most forceful such statement by a Chinese leader yet.

For long Beijing has been accused (a person or group of people who are charged with or on trial for a crime) of not taking on the burdens of a leadership role commensurate (corresponding in size or degree) with its economic and strategic power. The changing world order may have left it with no option but to step up to the podium. It also turns the mirror on Beijing, demanding of it a lot more action to back its own words.