Read Editorial – The stakes in Manipur
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED: D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD
Manipur will vote in 38 of its 60 Assembly constituencies on Saturday in the first of two phases. This election is shaping up into something new for Manipur’s polity, a direct contest between two national parties, the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party. The Congress is seeking (attempt to find (something)) to defend (resist an attack made on (someone or something); protect from harm or danger) its 15-year record in power, while the BJP fancies its chances in a State that has generally voted favourably for the party ruling at the Centre. The four-month-long blockade (seal off (a place) to prevent goods or people from entering or leaving) by the United Naga Council of highways leading up to the valley has dominated the discourse in the run-up to the elections.
The Manipur elections are important for both national parties. The Congress is seeking to retain (continue to have (something); keep possession of ) its hold as the only party that has electoral support across various ethnic and geographic regions in the State, while the BJP is keen (having or showing eagerness or enthusiasm) to get power in another northeastern State, after its victory last year in Assam. A contest between the Congress and the BJP in Manipur is welcome, as both parties do not represent any specific ethnic groups, unlike other parties in the fray (investigate and solve or explain) in previous elections.
But the BJP lacks a grassroots (the most basic level of an activity or organization) base in Manipur and largely comprises leaders who have defected from the Congress. This has resulted in a political campaign largely made up of accusations (a charge or claim that someone has done something illegal or wrong) and counter-accusations of corruption, besides the blame game on the ongoing blockade.The decision in early December 2016 by the Okram Ibobi Singh government to notify the formation of seven new districts, creating 16 districts in the State, was momentous (important; significant).
It allowed the Congress to seek (attempt to find (something)) support from the hill areas for this decision, as the new districts in the hills made for better administrative access in areas far from the valley. However, it resulted in the intensification (the action of making or becoming more intense) of the blockade sponsored by the UNC, severely hitting normal life in Manipur. The persistence (stamina ; staying with power) of the blockade has led to some degree of disaffection owing to the inability of the Congress government to bring it to an end, even if the government’s defence that any punitive measures against the UNC would have led to violence cannot be summarily dismissed.
The Congress blames the Centre for not prevailing (existing at a particular time; current) upon the UNC and other Naga groups to end the blockade, while the BJP blames the Congress for precipitating the crisis (a time of intense difficulty or danger) . In a State where insurgent groups remain active and that is still dependent on Central transfer of resources to shore up its economy, the electorate would have welcomed a genuine discourse on such issues in the run-up to the elections. Sadly, this did not happen.
Also Read Editorial - Episode Number 298 Become a Wordsmith - A Skilled User of Words