Read Editorial with D2G – Ep 509

Read Editorial with D2G – Ep 509

Return to frontpage

Setback in Myanmar: on military coup

D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
Read Editorial

Meanings are given in BOLD

In one swift operation, Myanmar’s military establishment has wiped ( to remove something ) out a decade of the country’s democratisation process. By arresting President Win Myint, State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi and the rest of the ruling National League for Democracy (NLD) leadership, and declaring military rule under a state of emergency for at least a year, General Min Aung Hlaing has made it clear that it is the military that is in charge, and he is not particularly concerned about the opposition to or condemnation ( the expression of very strong disapproval; censure ) of the move.

The immediate reason for the coup ( a sudden, illegal and often violent change of government ) was that the newly elected National Assembly was due to meet in Naypyidaw on Monday, despite the Tatmadaw’s (Army’s) claims that the November general elections had several irregularities, and its contestation ( the action or process of disputing or arguing ) of the NLD’s landslide victory.

Ms. Suu Kyi had refused to bow to Gen. Hlaing’s demand that the results, which also saw the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party with a reduced strength in Parliament, be set aside. Clearly, the Army, which still nominates a fourth of the parliamentary seats and retains ( not abolish or alter; maintain ) the important Defence, Borders and Interior portfolios, felt it was better to dismiss the NLD government before it increased its clout ( influence or power, especially in politics or business ).

Gen. Hlaing is due to retire this year, and it is possible that the move was meant to extend his longevity ( long existence or service ) in power. Backed ( give financial, material, or moral support to ) by a silent Beijing, the junta leadership may also have gambled ( take risky action in the hope of a desired result ) that it was better to take drastic action against the democratic leaders before the new U.S. administration finds its feet.

The return to Army rule was also helped to some extent by Ms. Suu Kyi, who came to office in 2015, but has lost opportunities to put her country more firmly ( with little possibility of movement; securely ) on the road to democracy. She has accepted a dual power system in the state. Daw Suu, as she is known, has also failed to bring democracy to her party, and been criticised for her autocratic ( taking no account of other people’s wishes or opinions; domineering ) style.

Her refusal to rein in the Generals when the Tatmadaw unleashed ( cause (a strong or violent force) to be released or become unrestrained ) a pogrom on the Rohingya between 2016-17, had lost the Nobel Peace laureate ( a person who is honoured with an award for outstanding creative or intellectual achievement ) much international support. Regardless ( without regard or consideration for ) of the reasons for the coup, the step is a setback for the international community’s efforts to engage with Myanmar, after a strict sanctions regime.

For India, which had cultivated a careful balance, between nudging ( touch or push (something) gently or gradually ) along the democratic process by supporting Ms. Suu Kyi, and working with the military to ensure ( make certain that (something) will occur or be the case ) its strategic interests to the North East and deny China a monopoly ( the exclusive possession, control, or exercise of something ) on Myanmar’s infrastructure and resources, the developments are unwelcome.

The government will need to craft its response taking into consideration the new geopolitical realities of the U.S. and China as well as its own standing as a South Asian power, and as a member of the UN Security Council. New Delhi’s immediate reaction, to merely ( just; only ) express “deep concern” and counsel following the rule of law and democratic processes, is unlikely to suffice ( be enough or adequate ) as a long-term strategy.

Leave a Comment