Read Editorial with D2G – Ep 508

Read Editorial with D2G – Ep 508

Return to frontpage

Getting back on track: on Union Budget 2021

D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.

Read Editorial

Meanings are given in BOLD

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman made a brave effort to make good use of the lessons learnt from the unprecedented ( never having happened or existed before  ) global health crisis and ensuing ( to happen after (and often as a result of) something else ) economic setback ( a difficulty or problem that stops you progressing as fast as you would like ) to put lives and livelihoods back on track.

There is greater spending on health care and some fiscal push to undergird ( provide support or a firm basis for ) the struggling demand in the pandemic-hit economy. But this is no transformative budget that lives up to the heightened ( more intense than normal ) expectations of a weary ( feeling or showing extreme tiredness, especially as a result of excessive exertion ) population waiting for manna ( something beneficial that appears or is provided unexpectedly or opportunely ) from the government.

A lot more could have been done to address the chronic underinvestment in India’s public health infrastructure by appreciably ( to an appreciable extent; considerably ) raising expenditure. The Union Budget for 2021-2022 presented to Parliament on Monday, instead reveals an estimated health outlay ( an amount of money spent on something ) of ₹74,602 crore, almost 10% lower than the revised estimate of ₹82,445 crore earmarked for health spending in the current fiscal year.

The Minister, however, has claimed a 137% increase in the budgetary outlay on ‘health and wellbeing’ by including a one-time expenditure of ₹35,000 crore set aside for the COVID-19 vaccination programme, ₹60,030 crore budgeted for the department of drinking water and sanitation, as well as the Finance Commission’s grants for both water and sanitation and health totalling to almost ₹50,000 crore.

While it is an inarguable ( not open to disagreement; indisputable ) fact that the availability of vaccines, ensuring universal access to safe drinking water and proper sanitation and adequate nutrition are all key in determining a population’s wellbeing, an abiding ( lasting a long time; enduring ) thrust ( push suddenly or violently in a specified direction ) on creating and maintaining a sizeably more extensive public health infrastructure needed a substantially ( for the most part; essentially ) higher outlay on the standalone head.

In fact, the Economic Survey had eloquently ( in a fluent or persuasive manner ) made the case for providing a massive boost to health spending, which it reasoned would serve as a direct means to raising overall economic output by reducing the economic burden of illnesses. To her credit, the Minister did announce that the government intends to introduce a new centrally sponsored scheme, ‘PM Atma Nirbhar Swasth Bharat Yojana’, to develop primary, secondary, and tertiary ( third in order or level ) care capacities over the next six years, at an estimated cost of ₹64,180 crore.

How exactly this scheme pans out in terms of strengthening the beleaguered ( in a very difficult situation ) public health infrastructure in the remote and far-flung ( widely distributed ) corners could well determine how prepared India is for the next unforeseen ( not anticipated or predicted ) health emergency. A sizeable ( fairly large ) fiscal ( relating to government revenue, especially taxes ) stimulus ( an interesting and exciting quality ) to reinvigorate ( give new energy or strength to ) consumption demand could have gone a long way in completing the recovery.

While the revised estimates for the current financial year project a fiscal deficit of 9.5% of GDP on account of expenditure surging ( (of a crowd or a natural force) move suddenly and powerfully forward or upward ) to ₹34.50-lakh crore, the Minister has opted ( make a choice from a range of possibilities ) for a mere ₹33,000 crore increase in the overall expenditure outlay in her Budget estimates for the next fiscal.

Here again, she has pointed to the ₹5.54-lakh crore set aside for capital expenditure to contend ( struggle to surmount (a difficulty) ) a 34.5% increase in outlay over the current year’s Budget estimate. Far from being an expansionary Budget, Ms. Sitharaman has opted to contain overall spending so as to rein ( keep under control; restrain ) in the fiscal deficit to 6.8% in the coming fiscal itself. The country cannot afford a premature scaling down of fiscal support at a time of rising inequality.

Leave a Comment