Relief for Pehlu’s sons: On Alwar lynching case
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED: D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
Meanings are given in Bold
The Rajasthan High Court’s order quashing ( reject as invalid, especially by legal procedure) the cow smuggling case against the sons of Pehlu Khan, a dairy farmer lynched ( (of a group of people) kill (someone) for an alleged offence without a legal trial, especially by hanging) by cow vigilantes ( a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate) in 2017, grants much-needed relief to the family. The Khans are yet to get any semblance ( resemblance; similarity) of justice for Pehlu Khan’s murder, as all those sent up for trial were acquitted ( free (someone) from a criminal charge by a verdict of not guilty) in August.
Of particular significance is Justice Pankaj Bhandari’s finding that Khan and his sons, Irshad and Arif, besides truck driver Khan Mohammed, were not transporting cattle for slaughter ( kill (animals) for food); rather, the cows and calves in their possession were meant for dairy farming. Although High Courts do not normally intervene ( take part in something so as to prevent or alter a result or course of events) after the filing of the charge sheet, they have the power to do so if there is manifest ( be evidence of ; prove) abuse of the process. In this case, the police appear to have tried to show that milch ( denoting a cow or other domestic mammal giving or kept for milk) cows and calves were animals meant for slaughter.
It is quite apparent that they were trying perversely ( in a manner contrary to what is expected or ) to build a narrative that it was the victims who were primarily at fault. Pehlu Khan and his sons had bought the animals at a cattle fair in Jaipur and were taking them to Nuh in Haryana, when they were attacked by a mob on April 1, 2017. Khan succumbed ( fail to resist pressure, temptation, or some other negative force) to his injuries in hospital two days later. Though it was under the erstwhile ( old ; past ) BJP government that a case was registered against Pehlu Khan and others under the Rajasthan Bovine ( relating to or affecting cattle) Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, the charge sheet was filed by the police only in May this year, after a change of regime.
The development caused some embarrassment to the Congress regime of Ashok Gehlot, but the government subsequently made up for it by enacting an anti-lynching law. Further, soon after the six suspects in the murder case were acquitted, the government set up a committee to probe ( a thorough investigation into a crime or other matter) the lapses ( a brief or temporary failure of concentration, memory, or judgement) in the investigation. It also filed an appeal in the High Court against their acquittal. The invalidation of the cow smuggling case is a face-saver for the present regime ( a government, especially an authoritarian one) too.
The Pehlu Khan murder case attained emblematic ( serving as a symbol of a particular quality or concept; ) significance not only because it was one of the earliest instances of the wave of vigilante attacks across the country in the name of cow protection; it was also because it contained all the ingredients of a hate crime: unplanned violence, ideological motivation, intolerance towards sections of society and interference with dietary choice. The manner in which the murder case was allowed to collapse in court, possibly due to planned lapses, shows how the system was rigged ( assemble and adjust readiness for operation) to favour the mob. What is now left for the State government is to make a sincere effort to salvage ( rescue ; save) the murder case. If there is sufficient evidence that the real perpetrators ( a person who carries out a harmful, illegal, or immoral act) were dropped from the case deliberately, it should try to get a fresh trial ordered against those responsible and secure appropriate punishment for them.