Read Editorial – In Largesse We Trust
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED: D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD
Chairing his first cabinet meeting after taking over the reins (guide) in Uttar Pradesh, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath approved a write-off on outstanding farmer loans of up to 1 lakh taken before March 31, 2016. The State cabinet also decided to waive (reject; ignore) loans worth 6,000 crore extended to small and marginal farmers that had turned into non-performing assets (a useful or valuable thing or person). Together, this package, aimed at fulfilling the Bharatiya Janata Party’s election promise, will cost the exchequer (a royal or national treasury) about 36,000 crore.
There was no mention of a bigger plan to ramp (increase the level or amount of (something) sharply) up the farm sector, in which U.P. invested just 2.3% of total expenditure in 2016-17 — one of the lowest rates across major States. A little earlier, the Madras High Court ordered the Tamil Nadu government to extend a similar farm loan waiver scheme for small farmers (with land holdings of up to 5 acres) and marginal farmers (who own up to 2.5 acres) to all farmers. Officials have even been forbidden (not allowed; banned) from trying to recover loans where repayments have slipped.
The State, which had already doled out (divide; distribute) 5,780 crore on this front, would need nearly 2,000 crore more to comply (act in accordance with a wish or command) with the court’s order. This is a worrying trend for a country that wants to double agricultural incomes by 2022. Not only could it trigger a countrywide clamour (shout loudly and insistently) for similar debt relief packages, political parties would also be more inclined to make such grand promises ahead of future polls. This is a slippery slope with multiple unintended (not planned or meant) outcomes likely in the years to come.
The Madras High Court has clearly reached into the domain of the executive. The risk is that this overreach could be cited in other courts to seek omnibus loan waivers. Opposition parties in U.P. have already criticised the cap of 1 lakh on farm loans that will attract relief. The timing of these drastic (likely to have a strong or far-reaching effect; radical and extreme) interventions (interference by a state in another’s affairs) is unusual as India had a good monsoon in the 2016-17 crop season, after two years of drought, and a bumper output is expected for all major crops barring (except for; if not for) sugarcane.
Forgiving loan burdens (a load, typically a heavy one)is a powerful political gesture (a movement of part of the body, especially a hand or the head, to express an idea or meaning) that glosses (shine or lustre on a smooth surface) over the fact that governments have had little patience to make agriculture a sustainable (able to be maintained at a certain rate or level) economic activity with efficient linkages to formal markets, be it for credit or for supply chains from farm gate to fork.
FDI of up to 100% was allowed in food retail trading but investments are stuck over the reluctance (unwillingness or disinclination to do something) to allow a small proportion of non-food sales. Writing off loans as a blanket policy, without scrutiny (critical observation or examination) and restructuring attempts creates a moral hazard for borrowers, who will have no incentive to stick to credit discipline. Frequent write-offs will prod (nudge; push) banks to invest in alternatives such as the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund instead of reaching out to individual farmers to meet their agricultural lending targets. In which case, usurious (much too high) local moneylenders could have a field day.
Read Editorial – Next steps on GST
Read Editorial – The stakes in Manipur
Read Editorial – Don’t Link School Meals To Aadhaar
Read Editorial – A clean-up act: no compromise over air quality